Section 106 Consultation

The review process specified under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act is being followed for the West-wide Energy Corridor PEIS.

The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires federal agencies to consider the effect of their undertakings on historic properties. Regulations issued by the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation under Section 106 of the NHPA specify the required review process. (For further explanation of Section 106 of the NHPA, see: http://www.achp.gov/work106.html.) Since this project will result in amendments to land use plans, and will not result in direct effects to cultural resources, the agencies are using the NEPA process to fulfill their responsibilities for compliance with Section 106 as permitted in the Section 106 regulations. Full compliance with Section 106 will, of course, occur when energy transmission projects are actually proposed within the corridors.

An important part of the Section 106 review process is consultation with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Officer(s) (SHPOs), all Federally recognized Native American tribes that have an interest in the area being affected, and with any persons or organizations that are interested in the cultural resources that could be impacted by the project. Any parties wishing to contact us with Section 106 or cultural resource concerns may do so at: wwecsection106@anl.gov

Lead Federal Agency for Section 106 Review

The West-wide Energy Corridor Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (WWEC PEIS) involves the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), and the Department of Defense (DoD). The Bureau of Land Management has been designated by the participating agencies as the Lead Federal Agency for the Section 106 review process. A working group consisting of representatives from each of the agencies was created to support BLM in this process.

Conducting the Section 106 Review

The PEIS process attempts to identify the type and extent of the impacts associated with the designation of energy corridors on Federal lands in the eleven Western states. For the WWEC PEIS, compliance with Section 106 includes a programmatic assessment of the types of historic properties known and likely to occur within the designated corridors and the development of recommendations to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts to historic properties that will guide the agencies in the review of any subsequent development projects. A second phase of the Section 106 review process that is beyond the scope of the current PEIS will occur when a development project is proposed within a designated corridor; at that time, specific projects will be subject to Section 106 review.

The BLM has contacted the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the National Conference of SHPOs concerning the PEIS. Data requests for cultural resource information were submitted to all eleven Western SHPOs. The BLM, together with the interagency working group, is consulting with interested parties and many of the Western SHPOs concerning cultural resources on this project. Government-to-government consultation is proceeding with Tribes; further information on this important part of the process is available on the Government-to-Government Consultation page of this Web site.

The PEIS will provide the agency managers with information on how the various alternative actions would impact the environment. Once the PEIS is completed, the affected agencies will each sign a Record of Decision (ROD). These RODs will amend land use plans to designate corridors for future energy development. As development proceeds, agencies will conduct Section 106 compliance and NEPA reviews for individual proposed right-of-way projects. The intent of the WWEC PEIS is to guide future development of the designated corridors in order to reduce the proliferation of rights-of-way across the landscape. However, on any given project, land managers will retain the ability to consider options for rights-of-way outside the designated corridors should conditions warrant. Furthermore, prospective developers are not constrained to remain within or use designated corridors.